Trump Accuses Obama of Treason Over 2016 “Russia Hoax”
President Donald Trump recently accused former President Barack Obama of treason. The remarks, made during an event with Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos, Jr., referenced declassified documents released by Director of National Intelligence (DNI) Tulsi Gabbard concerning the Obama administration’s handling of intelligence on Russian election interference in 2016.
Trump stated: “The leader of the gang: Barack HUSSEIN Obama, have you heard of him?… HE’S GUILTY! It’s there! He’s guilty, this was TREASON.” He accused Obama of colluding with Hillary Clinton, Joe Biden, James Comey, John Brennan, and James Clapper, asserting that the group orchestrated efforts to undermine his 2016 campaign and presidency. Trump added, “We have all of the documents! Tulsi has thousands of additional documents coming!” He described Obama as the chief architect of the strategy.
Resurrecting Controversy
The resurrection of what President Trump calls the “Russia Hoax” controversy revives debates from the 2016 election a decade ago.
His comments followed Gabbard’s declassification of documents alleging that Obama administration officials “manufactured and politicized” intelligence. These materials reportedly include communications from a December 2016 White House meeting involving top national security officials and a January 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) on Russian activities. Gabbard described this as a “treasonous conspiracy” aimed at subverting Trump’s election victory and initiating a “years-long coup,” and referred documents to the Department of Justice for potential prosecution.
Sowing Discord
Some, including Obama spokesman Patrick Rodenbush, dismissed the claims as “outrageous” and a “weak attempt at distraction,” doubling down on the now widely discredited Steele dossier and claims that Russia interfered in the 2016 election to aid Trump. This alleged interference consisted of a private company called the Internet Research Agency (whose owners were Russian nationals) spending roughly $46,000 on 3,000 Facebook and Instagram ads from mid-2015 to mid-2017, a tiny fraction compared to the $81 million spent by the Trump and Clinton campaigns combined on the platforms.
Analyses of the released ads showed that a significant portion promoted content supportive of Bernie Sanders or Hillary Clinton, while other ads backed Trump or stoked conservative grievances. The overarching goal, per U.S. intelligence and a 2019 report by special counsel Robert Mueller, was to sow discord, erode trust in institutions, and amplify polarization rather than solely run a pro-Trump media campaign. Regardless, $46,000 in Facebook ads didn’t make a blip on the radar screen of the billions spent cumulatively by both campaigns.
This article is part of The New American’s weekly online newsletter Insider Report, which is emailed to TNA subscribers each week. Click here to subscribe to The New American to receive the Insider Report and access exclusive content.
