Pseudo-elites Upset About Hungary’s “LGBT” Law and Immigration Opposition
sndr/iStock/Getty Images Plus
Article audio sponsored by The John Birch Society

Before the Sexual Devolution and immigrationist agenda, every knee must bend. That seems to be the message of the European Union’s pseudo-elites, who are upset about a pro-sexual-virtue law in Hungary and the country’s refusal to be balkanized. Yet the Hungarians are firm in their resolve.

This was made clear in a recent interview granted to the Associated Press by the nation’s foreign minister, Peter Szijjarto. In fact, there are even murmurings that Hungary, along with political bedfellow Poland, may leave the EU, with a Polish statesman saying this month that EU overlords had to be fought as were “past Nazi and Soviet occupiers.”

Hungary’s sexuality oriented law is known as the “Anti-Pedophilia Act.” It prohibits the “promotion of homosexuality” or the so-called transgender phenomenon (the Made-up Sexual Status, or MUSS, agenda) to people less than 18 years old; this means that advertisements showcasing homosexuality or a MUSS may not be shown if they’re considered to be aimed at minors.

The law also mandates that school sex-education may only be taught by government-approved instructors.

This has inspired EU ire, with the Tolerance Crew wholly unwilling to tolerate deviation from their deviance. The EU is also angry that Hungary won’t allow itself to be flooded with Third World migrants the way Western European nations have been and takes issue with what it claims is the country’s erosion of judicial independence and media freedom. (There’s no word on whether the EU puppeteers view leftism-enabling activist judges and Big Tech as reflecting “judicial independence and media freedom.”)

But Foreign Minister Szijjarto said in the AP interview, on Thursday, that Hungary would not budge one centimeter despite financial penalties assessed, and legal action taken, against it by the EU.

“‘We do not compromise on these issues because we are a sovereign country, a sovereign nation. And no one, not even the European Commission, should blackmail us regarding these policies,’ Szijjarto said,” the AP reported.

The EU’s executive commission is withholding billions in economic recovery aid from Hungary in response to the nation’s policies. Szijjarto called this “a purely political decision” and “blackmail,” the AP also relates. “The [pro-virtue] law, he says, is meant to protect children from pedophiles and ‘homosexual propaganda.’”

“We will not make compromises about the future of our children,” Szijjarto further told the AP.

Ironically, the EU accuses Hungary of “straying from democratic values,” as the AP puts it, all while trying to coerce a change in policy instituted by a democratically elected government.

Russia had enacted a similar anti-sexual devolutionary law in 2014, which is likely one reason our pseudo-elites despise that nation. But Russia is not part of the EU — and some now say Hungary shouldn’t be, either. 

For instance, “Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte said Hungary ‘has no business’ in the EU,” the AP reported in a different article last week. He “suggested [that Hungarian prime minister] Orban activate the mechanism that precipitated Brexit.”

But this statement was perhaps driven by either emotion or calculation, and calls by some Hungarian and Polish figures to leave the EU are most likely also a calculation, one designed to create leverage. Note that Poland and Hungary are the two largest recipients of EU money, which explains why the nations remain tied to such an ideologically alien bloc — and wouldn’t want to say adios to it. Handouts make strange bedfellows.

And the sexual devolutionaries are strange, indeed. Though Western pseudo-elites would paint Hungary, Russia, and Poland as anomalies, it’s the sexual devolutionary side that may be, globally speaking, short on adherents (and perhaps short-lived?).

For example, their agenda is unwelcome in most of Africa; in fact, when the Obama administration pushed sexual-devolutionary measures on the continent, some Africans were mystified, wondering what the obsession with homosexuality was all about.

Moreover, China just prohibited the portrayal of “sissy men” on TV as part of a “masculinization” effort. As for the Muslim world, well, you know what kind of reception the sexual devolutionary agenda gets there.

China’s crackdown is not surprising. Beijing is surely happy to see vice reign in America, precisely because it knows that corruption undermines civilization. Consider, for example, that among the 45 communist goals read into the Congressional Record by Representative Albert S. Herlong, Jr. of Florida in 1963 was the following, number 26:

“Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as ‘normal, natural and healthy.’”

This “goal,” related during Cold War days and reportedly originating in the USSR, was, of course, only a goal for America.

In the Soviet Union, homosexual relationships were criminalized.

This said, no “Evil Empire” is necessary today (if it ever was) to visit moral corruption on the West. As Soviet defector Yuri Bezmenov put it in the 1980s when talking about the “demoralization” of the United States, most of it is done “by Americans and to Americans.” It’s also done by Europeans — to Europeans.

But not to Hungary and Poland, at least not yet (though different policies can be just one election away). These nations are wise, too, to focus not just on schools, but entertainment. As I’ve oft warned, yes, education (and mis-education) surely do matter; nonetheless, children are more likely to disobey their teachers than the seducers on TV. Who, after all, do they think is “cooler”?

This is why life imitates art just as art imitates life. For as entertainment changes, the laws of a nation eventually follow.