Report: Fauci, CDC, and Surgeon General Knew the Covid Jab Caused Miscarriages. They Pushed It Anyway

On February 1, 2021, USA Today published an article titled, “Should pregnant women get the COVID-19 vaccine? Dr. Anthony Fauci sees ‘no red flags’ in safety data.” Three days later, Fox News ran something similar: “Fauci: ‘No red flags’ for pregnant women taking COVID-19 vaccine in trials ‘thus far’: Fauci says more than 10,000 pregnant women have been in trials.” On February 10, about a week after that, Axios provided 10,000 more reasons for pregnant women to trust the science: “Fauci: 20,000 pregnant women have had COVID vaccine without complications.”

But there were red flags, and Fauci knew about them before those articles were ever published. So did the director of the CDC and the surgeon general of the United States. They discussed the risks in private conversations a week before the first of the articles came out. On January 25, 2021, Fauci privately acknowledged that the mRNA concoction he would spend the next two years working to coercively jam into every American had the potential to kill unborn children. This is the latest piece of news proving that Fauci spent an enormous time gaslighting the public during the Covid era.

The Phone Data

Congress has obtained the cellphone Fauci used during Covid. We have Senators Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) and Rand Paul (R-Ky.) to thank for that. Fauci’s phone, according to Johnson, contains more than 34,000 text messages, 522 voicemails, and only three contacts. Johnson found that last piece “pretty odd.” He said he’ll be looking into whether someone deleted information from the phone before Congress got its hands on it.

Paul was also instrumental in getting hold of the diary that the former head of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) kept during the Covid era. Both the phone and the diary are public property. Fauci made the unusual yet publicly beneficial decision to keep his diary on a government server. And thanks to Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.’s cooperation, the parent agency of NIAID has provided the American public with receipts of what Fauci really thought and said while he was orchestrating America’s disastrous response to Covid-19.

According to a record of a text conversation Fauci had with then-CDC Director Rochelle Walensky and then-U.S. Surgeon General Vivek Murthy, he knew of the legitimate concern that the jab could cause miscarriages. Murthy is the one who brought up the concern. At first, Fauci said there were no data or theoretical reasons to worry. But two hours later, he re-emerges in the text chain. And this time, his posture is different. He says:

I asked around a bit more and another issue came up that you need to be aware of. Since many people have significant cytokines storm and fever after the 2nd dose, this theoretically could be associated with miscarriage in the 1st trimester.

Walensky and Murthy both responded sensibly. “Definitely a good point, [especially] after dose two,” says Walensky. “This is really helpful, thanks,” Murthy responded. “I’ve been hearing the concern about the mRNA causing mutations in the developing fetus as well. That’s a really good point re the cytokine storm post second dose.”

The Coverup

Apparently, it was such a good point that not one person in this text chain thought of sharing it with the public. In fact, they told the American people the complete opposite. A few months later, Walensky announced that the “CDC strongly recommends COVID-19 vaccination either before or during pregnancy because the benefits of vaccination outweigh known or potential risks.” Murthy would later say, “It’s all the more important for you to get vaccinated if you are pregnant or if you are trying to become pregnant.… The data points show that the vaccines are safe during these various stages before and during pregnancy…. They found generally that anytime during your pregnancy is actually fine [to get the shot], and that’s why the recommendation is just to get it.”

“Just get it,” they said. And that’s what about 80 percent of the U.S. population did. And as we now know, the results are devastating. In October 2025, The New American dedicated a print issue to documenting the Covid vaccine carnage. Part of that report focused on the collapse of fertility. We cited a study out of the Czech Republic that analyzed data from 1.3 million women aged 18 to 39. We reported:

Over the course of two years, women who received a Covid vaccine prior to conception experienced a 33-percent lower rate of successful pregnancy compared to their unvaccinated peers. The signal was consistent across the dataset, with dramatic disparities emerging at key points. In June 2021, for example, 39 percent of women were vaccinated, yet they accounted for only seven percent of all successful conceptions. Throughout 2022, the trend remained steady: Vaccinated women consistently had 1.5 times fewer live births than their unvaccinated counterparts. Meanwhile, the Czech Republic’s total fertility rate plunged from 1.83 to 1.45 — a 21-percent decline in just two years.

We Were Warned

Many experts in the medical-freedom movement warned us from the beginning. Among the most vocal was Dr. Peter McCulllough. He said early in 2021, “Before we know it, we’re vaccinating pregnant women. Why are we doing that? That can’t be safe.” The “fact-checkers” rebuked him right away. “That’s not what doctors with the relevant expertise say,” they bellowed. In 2023, McCulllough posted on social media the very concern Fauci, Walensky, and Murthy shared in that private text conversation on January 25, 2021. McCullough said:

Vaccination of any type in pregnancy provokes a fever which can trigger a miscarriage, stillbirth, and premature labor. Many women consider these risks far greater than the theoretical benefit of reducing the risks of mild/treatable illnesses.

The Covid jab rollout began in December 2020 with priority on vulnerable populations. As the months progressed, it became more widely available and pressure for everyone to take it built up. In our January 18, 2021, issue, The New American published a short article asking, “Should You or Should You Not Take the Vaccine?” We said, “Women who are pregnant or considering pregnancy might wish to avoid the vaccine.” Our advice was based on the lack of testing results available at the time.

In March, we asked the same question. America’s Frontline Doctors (AFLDS) were concerned about this as well. And they were looking at a petition that Drs. Wolfgang Wodarg and Michael Yeadon had filed to the European Medicines Agency for a stay of action to halt phase III trials of the Pfizer vaccine. We reported that Wodarg and Yeadon were concerned because:

the mRNA vaccines might lead to infertility. Noting that the vaccines are intended to produce antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 spike proteins, they argue that those spike proteins contain syncytin homologous proteins and that as a result, antibodies developed by the vaccines might target syncytin naturally occurring in the human body. “Syncytin-1,” they write, “is responsible for the development of a placenta in mammals and humans and is therefore an essential prerequisite for a successful pregnancy.”

The more information emerges about the people who drove the policies of the most tyrannical time period in U.S. history, the more obvious it becomes why most Founding Fathers despised centralization. The U.S. Constitution does not permit a national health agency. And if there were none, there would have been no Fauci, no CDC, no surgeon general, and likely no one to carry out this mass experiment on humans.