Tucker Carlson Shocked by Doctor’s Claim About Covid “Vaccine” Deaths
MarsBars/iStock/Getty Images Plus
Article audio sponsored by The John Birch Society

It was three days after his second Covid shot, in 2021, that Jacob Clynick unexpectedly passed away.

He was 13 years old — with no known health problems.

Later the same year, 16-year-old Ernesto Ramirez, Jr. died five days after taking just one Pfizer Covid shot.

The story was the same with both boys: Their hearts were notably enlarged, having been subject to inflammation. It’s now well known, too, that this can be a side-effect of the shots.

Of course, some will say there’s nothing to see here. In our country of 343 million people, there are eight million tragedies in the naked city. And kids die all the time. It’s only that “anti-vaxxers” started taking note of it after embracing a Covid-shot-boogeyman mentality. But one expert who doesn’t believe this for a second is Dr. Mary Talley Bowden.

Deadly Medicine?

Sounding an alarm on an episode of The Tucker Carlson Show last week, Bowden raised host Carlson’s eyebrows. As the Daily Mail reports in a rather biased article:

Bowden, a staunch opponent of vaccine mandates who was suspended and then resigned from Houston Methodist Hospital over [so-called] Covid vaccine misinformation in 2021, said there have been ‘38,000 deaths from these COVID shots.’

The death count was gleaned from CDC VAERS, a voluntary adverse affect reporting database that allows anyone to submit their side effects following vaccination, and where families and doctors can report patients who have died.

…Dr Bowden said the FDA should have removed the vaccines from the market but instead expanded their use to other age groups, including infants, adding the shots for children under 12 have not been fully approved by the FDA as they have for other age groups, but rather maintain their Emergency Use Authorization status, which still means they have been deemed safe and effective.

Still, Carlson was shocked: “‘”This is going on right now? I think we voted against this.”

In reality, there was never any good reason to give youngsters Covid shots. Just consider one study focusing on Germany, a Montana-sized country of 84 million, during a 15-month, peak-pandemic period.

It found that not even one healthy child died of Covid.

Moreover, the CDC’s own data informed years ago already that people up to age 19 have a 99.997 percent chance of surviving the disease.

Given this, the results of a 2022 analysis are not surprising. It determined that mass Covid inoculation of children would claim 117 kids’ lives for every one saved by the shot.

Verily, VAERS?

As for the VAERS data, the Daily Mail, ostensibly aiming to combat misinformation, correctly states that the system

cannot prove that any medicine or vaccine caused the side effects or deaths listed, but rather it represents the number of deaths that happened to be reported to the system that occurred among people who had been vaccinated, regardless of the cause.

(Note, however, that the paper then peddles misinformation itself. For it later claims that “roughly 1.2 million Americans have died of Covid since early 2020.” In reality, this figure appears vastly inflated.)

Yet there’s more than just VAERS raising a red flag. For example, consider comments made by insurance company OneAmerica’s CEO, Scott Davison, in a December 30, 2021 virtual news conference.

We are witnessing “the highest death rates we have seen in the history of this business,” he said. And “not just at OneAmerica. The data is consistent across every player in that business.”

Davison further informed that this death wave involved working age people (18-64) and started in 2021’s “third quarter.” This roughly coincides with when the Covid shots were pushed on people under 65. Most of these weren’t Covid-19-induced deaths, either.

The CEO also stated that the numbers are so bad that the situation is worse than “a one-in-200-year catastrophe.”

The Catastrophe Continues?

Then there’s the recent testimonial of Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong, a renowned physician and current owner of the Los Angeles Times. Also speaking with Tucker Carlson, Soon-Shiong discussed America’s post-Covid-period surge of cancers in young people. This includes cancers that previously afflicted only the aged. As BPR reported March 29:

“Now you understand what keeps me awake at night,” he [Soon-Shiong] told Carlson. “You see young people with pancreatic cancer all of a sudden. You see young people with colon cancer all of a sudden.”

“So is it by coincidence that post-COVID infection, post-COVID vaccine, we’ve seen all these events…? I don’t think so. I think it’s not a coincidence,” he went on.

To be clear, Soon-Shiong didn’t say whether the cancer increase was caused by Covid or the shots meant to combat it. He apparently believes that one, the other, or both could be the culprit.

The Coincidences Never Cease

Regardless, too many Americans have had experiences that leave them with no doubt. I’ve heard from them — and am one of them.

For example, within a short period of time in 2021, I met three men at the same recreational area who’d recently had heart attacks. All three had previously taken Covid shots. There also was the friend who suffered heart inflammation and an acquaintance who had an adverse reaction after Covid inoculations.

Then there was the man I met in a supermarket checkout line in 2022. He was holding a pair of floral bouquets that he’d bought for two different funerals. One was for his brother, who’d died of a heart attack — at age 24. The other was for a friend’s first grade son who’d passed away, mysteriously, in his sleep.

The man didn’t mention or even allude to their “vaccine” status. I didn’t have the heart to query him about it, either. He was glassy-eyed and clearly grieving, after all, so it just wasn’t the time. But along with the other experiences, it was quite a series of “coincidences.”

And, yes, I know the aforementioned are all anecdotes. But sometimes, just occasionally, anecdotes, multiplied, amount to not just something more convincing than a scientific sample. It’s also more scientific than people who, reflexively and risibly and without real proof, make a mantra of “safe and effective.”

For those interested, Carlson’s interview with doctors Bowden and Soon-Shiong are below.