Trump Agrees With Democratic Officials and Operatives on Vote Fraud

“I think there’s a lot of voter fraud.… They put them [people] in a bus and go poll site to poll site.”

No, the preceding wasn’t uttered by President Donald Trump, but by Democrat Alan Schulkin. What would he know? He was only an election commissioner — voting affairs were his business.

Schulkin was the election commissioner of New York City, to be precise, when making his statement in 2015. He wasn’t called crazy or stupid, though — he was just ignored.

Trump, however, does get called crazy and stupid merely for agreeing with Schulkin, which he just did again.

“Does anybody really believe this ‘Election’ was honest?” the president wrote Monday on Truth Social. “How could the Polls be so wrong??? Some early voting ‘dumps’ were so large that it was impossible to win, no matter how many people went to vote. It’s all about the machines, which are far more important than the voter!” (Tweet below.)

What does Trump mean by the “early voting ‘dumps’” making it impossible to win? Well, consider Texas. Even if not one person voted for Senator-elect James Talarico (D) on Election Day, he would’ve still won based on early and mail-in ballots alone. Of course, this does not in and of itself prove there were “dumps” of fraudulent ballots. But it certainly is eyebrow-raising.

How Much Smoke Can There Be Without Fire?

Another Democrat Trump agrees with is someone we can’t name. This is because that man, a Democratic operative, spoke to the New York Post under the condition of anonymity. What would he know?

Well, he’s the type of person Schulkin warned us about. He led a team of vote fraudsters — stealing elections was his business.

“There is no race in New Jersey — from city council to United States Senate — that we haven’t worked on,” the operative told the Post in 2020. He also revealed that such efforts, which extend far beyond New Jersey, “could be enough to flip states.”

Yet if “they knew how the sausage was made,” he added, “they could fix it.”

I presented the operative’s testimonial, Schulkin, and more in the Friday video below.

This issue, however, is that many people don’t want to know how the sausage is made. This is because they either benefit from it or find the implications unsettling. And that’s why the Jersey fraudster’s statements were ignored, too. If you can’t ignore those sounding the alarm — or dismiss them as “crazy” or “stupid” — you’re taking them seriously. And charges taken seriously just may be investigated.

Regarding how the meat is made, ex-congressman Matt Gaetz noted an alarming phenomenon yesterday. (Some of his numbers were wrong; I made corrections via square brackets.)

“Fifty-seven million people voted [early] in the midterms,” he wrote on Facebook. “Twenty-four million of the new registrations lacked proof of citizenship. That is nearly half the [early-voting] electorate with unverified eligibility.”

Gaetz continued:

States that do not require documentary proof of citizenship have added tens of millions of names to the rolls in recent cycles. Those names remain eligible to cast ballots. When the volume of unverified registrations approaches half the [early-voting] total turnout, every subsequent result rests on a voter file that has not been confirmed.

Of course, none of the above proves that the midterms were completely stolen. There were many factors in the resounding Democratic victory, including voter discontent and the Left’s fielding of charismatic candidates. What it does evidence, however, is that our electoral system is ridden with holes.

Endless Clues (and Evidence?)

In reality, too, the aforementioned figures aren’t the only Democrats Trump agrees with on vote fraud. Just consider Scott Foval, an ex-Democratic operative. What would he know?

Well, he was in 2015 the national field director for left-wing group Americans United for Change. And it was then that Project Veritas (PV) caught him on hidden video saying:

It’s a very easy thing for Republicans to say, ‘Well, they’re bussing people in.’ Well, you know what? We’ve been bussing people in to deal with you f*****g a******s for 50 years and we’re not going to stop now.

This was a confession of the existence of the kind of vote fraud Schulkin warned about, according to PV.

Really, though, Trump agrees with multitudes of Democrats on electoral crime. Just consider the video below, titled “12 Minutes of Democrats Denying Election Results.”

Or, is it that these Democrats agree with Trump — that our system is ridden with exploitable holes?

Of course they do; that is, when they’re not pretending fraud doesn’t exist. They would know, too, better than anyone that fraud occurs because, well, they even cheat each other.

For example, mail-in vote fraud was so bad in Paterson, New Jersey, during a 2020 special election between two Democrats that a judge ordered a new election be held. The following video outlines the ensuing vote-fraud charges.

A judge also had to order a new election in 2023 for the Democratic mayoral primary in Bridgeport, Connecticut. The issue: egregious ballot stuffing (video below).

Also in 2023, a Democrat in Mississippi accused another Democrat of vote fraud (video below).

Once again, though, none of this reveals how many votes were stolen this election cycle. What’s for certain is this: Democrats know that other Democrats may and have cheat(ed) them. They believe that Republicans will cheat them. But they, prior to every general-election campaign, apparently have a provisional Road to Damascus moment.

You can decide if that thesis is crazy or stupid. What’s for sure is that it shouldn’t be ignored.