New Survey on Post-jab Blood Clots

Article audio sponsored by The John Birch Society

A new survey seeks to identify those in the general public who have experienced blood clotting issues in the past four years.

Retired Air Force Major Tom Haviland has been researching Covid jab-related adverse effects since losing his job in 2021 as a military contractor for refusing Biden’s mandates.

He discusses the results of initial studies in his article Worldwide Embalmer Blood Clot Surveys Show Possible Link to Covid Vaccines. Haviland also has new information from cardiologist and endovascular specialist reports that the same phenomenon is turning up in living patients.

This latest survey focuses on the public at large instead of specialists, whom Haviland has found to be reticent in reporting as they have licenses at stake.

“I believe that this 5-minute survey will yield some valuable data for us,” Haviland wrote by email. “I have already started to get some very interesting comments from early responders.”

One of particular note reads:

I work fitting patients for compression garments. Most clots are in the legs, but several have expressed that the clots extended into their groins, stomach, chest and one that went into the person’s neck from their foot. Most have had clots removed and are now wearing very tight compression to prevent new clots. It have fit men for medical pantyhose (this was rare before). My business has increased three times what it was in 2023, and the number of young people is shocking. Very few people have told me their issues are old or long-standing; most have never had problems before. Only one revealed their jab status, and they were jabbed/boosted. Many say the clots came on suddenly. There is a definite pattern.

The survey includes 11 questions asking for the respondent’s state of residence and whether “you or anyone that you know had blood clotting issues that started after January 2020.” Subsequent queries delve into details for those who respond affirmatively. So far, all early responders have answered “yes” to the second question.

Haviland hopes this survey will add to the effectiveness of his previous research. “I was able to get a lot of valuable data out of close to 300 embalmers,” he writes, happy that the results “did tremendous damage to Big Pharma’s ‘safe & effective’ narrative.”

You can access the survey here.