Ending Birthright Citizenship
On January 20, President Donald Trump signed an executive order declaring an end to the practice of birthright citizenship. This executive action marks a dramatic shift in U.S. immigration policy, with significant constitutional implications. It also reignites a debate over whether birthright citizenship is truly required by the 14th Amendment. A close examination of the Constitution, the intent of its framers, and relevant historical precedents reveals that birthright citizenship is neither constitutionally mandated nor consistent with the principles underlying American law and government.
The argument for birthright citizenship primarily hinges on the citizenship clause of the 14th Amendment, which reads: “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.”
The phrase “and subject to the jurisdiction thereof” is the crux of the issue. Advocates of birthright citizenship argue that this language simply requires physical presence within U.S. borders. However, such an interpretation ignores the historical and legal context of the 14th Amendment.
JBS Member or ShopJBS.org Customer?
Sign in with your ShopJBS.org account username and password or use that login to subscribe.
Subscribe Now
- 24 Issues Per Year
- Digital Edition Access
- Exclusive Subscriber Content
- Audio provided for all articles
- Unlimited access to past issues
- Cancel anytime.
- Renews automatically
Subscribe Now
- 24 Issues Per Year
- Print edition delivery (USA)
*Available Outside USA - Digital Edition Access
- Exclusive Subscriber Content
- Audio provided for all articles
- Unlimited access to past issues
- Cancel anytime.
- Renews automatically