Mayorkas Ends Migrant-protection Protocols That Kept Illegals in Mexico
AP Images
Article audio sponsored by The John Birch Society

Homeland Security chief Alejandro Mayorkas terminated former President Trump’s Migrant Protection Protocols yesterday, a move that will open the border to tens of thousands of “migrants” who have filed, and will file, phony asylum pleas.

Ending MPP stops Trump’s Remain in Mexico policy, which required “migrants” — leftist code for illegal aliens — to wait south of the border until authorities judged their asylum claims.

Most were bogus. But that fact is unimportant to President Biden and the anti-American radicals who run his regime.

Their goal: Overwhelm the country’s still-majority white population with “Latinos” and other Third World immigrants who will vote Democrat and cement permanent leftist control of the country.

Program Doesn’t Work

A Cuban immigrant and open-borders subversive, the DHS secretary ended the program in a memorandum to his top immigration officials who will implement what is known as The Great Replacement.

“I am by this memorandum terminating the MPP program,” Mayorkas wrote:

I direct DHS personnel to take all appropriate actions to terminate MPP, including taking all steps necessary to rescind implementing guidance and other directives or policy guidance issued to implement the program. 

Mayorkas Memo

The seven-page memo is the usual windy, obfuscatory bureaucratese. Summarized, it says this: I don’t like it, therefore it doesn’t work and I’m stopping it.

“I have determined that MPP does not adequately or sustainably enhance border management in such a way as to justify the program’s extensive operational burdens and other shortfalls,” he wrote. “Migrants” didn’t have the full opportunity to present their cases given that so many were adjudicated in absentia, he claimed. And border authorities wasted time and money handling the program. 

As well, the visa fraudster continued, MPP simply isn’t fair:

In deciding whether to maintain, modify, or terminate MPP I have reflected on my own deeply held belief, which is shared throughout this Administration, that the United States is both a nation of laws and a nation of immigrants, committed to increasing access to justice and offering protection to people fleeing persecution and torture through an asylum system that reaches decisions in a fair and timely manner. To that end, the Department is currently considering ways to implement long-needed reforms to our asylum system that are designed to shorten the amount of time it takes for migrants, including those seeking asylum, to have their cases adjudicated.

In other words, U.S. asylum and immigration policies are meant to benefit “migrants,” not to protect the border, which would benefit Americans.

Thus, “MPP is no longer a necessary or viable tool for the Department.… MPP is not the best strategy for implementing the goals and objectives of the Biden-Harris Administration.”

What might those “goals and objectives” be? The Great Replacement. Swamp the country with new Democrat voters.

“It’s not opinion that the replacement is happening, either, but long-standing fact,” as TNA’s Selwyn Duke wrote last week:

When the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965 took effect in 1968, the United States was the better part of 90 percent European-descent. But with 85 to 90 percent of our immigrants since that year coming from the Third World, the country is now only about 60 percent European-descent.

You may think this is a good thing or bad thing or a neutral thing, but it’s absolutely a real thing. It’s also a fact that 65 to 90 percent (depending on the group) of “non-white” Americans vote Democrat, whereas the GOP derives approximately 85 to 90 percent of its vote from whites. Many of the people who think our balkanization is a good thing, such as Machiavellian Democrats, know this — and that’s why they consider it a good thing.

Why Trump Created MPP

Trump created the MPP in January 2019 to block the tsunami of illegals trying to enter the country. Illegals routinely applied for asylum, then disappeared and refused to show up for hearings to adjudicate their cases.

As well, 90 percent of asylum claims were bogus; that is, immigration courts rejected them.

Surveys among deported “migrants” showed that nearly 100 percent left their home for economic reasons, which “migrants” admitted to reporters.

H/T: Breitbart