Doritos wants to avoid the fate of Bud Light, which lost close to $400 million in revenue after it got mixed up with a “transgender influencer.”
The global brand, owned by PepsiCo, has fired “transgender” pedophile Samantha Hudson from promoting the popular chips.
The reason: The tranny’s inflammatory pro-pedo and other repellent tweets that he now says he regrets.
Doritos says it didn’t fire Hudson because he masquerades as a woman and is indirectly grooming kids to pretend likewise.
The company didn’t like the heat from the tweets. And Rolling Stone, which published a statement from the company, claimed crazy, “transphobic” conservatives are to blame for a perfectly reasonable person losing his job.
Bye-bye, “Samantha”
Trouble began for Doritos when Hudson’s deranged tweets from years ago, before Twitter was renamed X, in which he condoned bullying, expressed desire to sodomize a 12-year-old girl, and said he wanted to destroy the nuclear family.
As The New American reported when the social media burst into flames over the hire, Hudson’s Twitter posts included these:
• I hate women who are victims of r*pe and who turn to self-help centers to overcome their trauma. What—heavy wh*res.
• If a minor came to ask me for help because she is being a victim of s*xual harassment, I would spit [in] her face.
And as Newsweek reported, he also wrote that he was “in the middle of the street in Mallorca in panties and screaming that I’m a nymphomaniac in front of a super beautiful 8-year-old girl.”
“The little ones too … they deserve pleasure,” he once wrote.
Hudson also wears ACAB attire, ACAB meaning All Cops Are Bastards.
X users erupted in fury that Doritos employed a man to peddle chips who is clearly a threat to kids.
The day after Doritos’ decision and Hudson’s demented tweets went viral and inspired a #boycottDoritos hashtag that trended on X, Ian Miles Cheong explained what had to happen.
“Make corporations afraid to go woke,” he wrote on X. And “If you disagree with this then you just don’t understand that we are in a culture war. The woke mind virus is an extinction level threat and it must be eradicated.”
Rolling Stone: Evil Conservatives Hate Trannies
Pro-tranny Rolling Stone (RS) bizarrely opined that the “trans influencer has drawn vitriol for all the wrong reasons” and is furious that anyone would opposed Hudson, opening its twisted take this way:
Ever since right-wing influencers orchestrated a boycott of Anheuser-Busch products last year for collaborating with trans influencer Dylan Mulvaney, they have been foaming at the mouth for a new product to boycott for incredibly stupid, hateful reasons. First, it was Frosted Flakes, due to its mascot posing for a photo with Mulvaney at the Tony Awards (a cultural event beloved by the right due to the absence of LGBTQ people in musical theater). Then, it was Cracker Barrel, because during Pride Month, the restaurant chain had the temerity to acknowledge the existence of gay people on its socials.
Of course, Hudson claimed to regret what he wrote. “I don’t know what to say, I don’t remember having written such barbarities,” he claimed, RS reported. “At that time I dedicated myself to saying nonsense, the heavier the better, because I thought that ‘dark humor’ was funny.”
Given that RS also gave the world A Rape on Campus, the hoax about a rape that never occurred at the University of Virginia, it’s no surprise that an RS writer would believe that baloney.
Anyway, Doritos told RS why it fired the deranged “influencer”:
A spokesperson for Doritos Spain also provided a statement saying the brand was “made aware of Samantha’s deleted Tweets from around 2015” after the campaign had started. “We have ended the relationship and stopped all related campaign activity due to the comments,” the spokesperson said. “We strongly condemn words or actions that promote violence or sexism of any kind.”
The magazine claimed that the “right wing” was mostly disturbed that Hudson was a “transgender,” and that concerns about his openly pedo tweets were an “afterthought”:
Although the right’s history of campaigning against brands for collaborating with LGBTQ influencers merits extensive mockery, it has, unfortunately, been somewhat effective in bringing down corporations’ bottom lines. Following the controversy over Dylan Mulvaney, Bud Light lost an estimated $395 million in U.S. sales, and Target also suffered a second-quarter slump after conservative activists rallied against its Pride Month merchandise, with the company even receiving bomb threats. The Doritos Spain debacle should, by any reasonable measures, be viewed as an instance of an overseas division of a brand failing to sufficiently vet an influencer’s social media history; instead, it’s being turned into a cri de coeur for a virulently transphobic sector of the right wing that is desperate to find something, anything, to get mad at.
After publishing A Rape on Campus, maybe RS shouldn’t be mocking anyone.
Cheong answered the RS lament. “Instead of covering the news like normal decent human beings, Rolling Stone decided to take the side of the trans influencer who said he wanted to do bad things to little girls, deeming it to be ‘transphobia’ in a typical ‘conservatives pounce!’ article,” he wrote on X. “So let’s clear this up: it is transphobic to oppose p*dophilia.”
That Doritos panicked after Hudson’s pedo tweet surfaced is no surprise. Anheuser-Busch lost $395 million in revenue after it plastered tranny Dylan Mulvaney’s visage on beer cans last year, and sales have not recovered for the former No. 1 best-selling beer.
