President Trump told reporters on Thursday that he would leave the White House in January if the Electoral College names Joe Biden the winner of the 2020 presidential election, but emphasized that he is not yet conceding.
“Certainly I will. And you know that,” the president said during a conference call when asked if he would leave the White House in the event of a Biden win in the Electoral College. But he added, “If they do, they made a mistake.”
“It’s going to be a very hard thing to concede,” President Trump told reporters during the call.
This marked the first time the president had taken questions directly from reporters since the election over three weeks ago.
Also during the call, President Trump asserted that he received significantly more than 74 million votes in the election, insisting votes for him were thrown out.
“I don’t know what is going to happen. I know one thing, Joe Biden did not get 80 million votes,” he said.
Speaking about America’s voting infrastructure, the president said “We are like a third world country.” He also told reporters he was not sure if he would attend the inauguration, assuming Joe Biden is ultimately inaugurated.
Additionally, the president said he planned on traveling to Georgia on Dec. 5 to support the GOP senators in their respective run-off races.
While the media quickly tried to spin President Trump’s remarks into an admission of defeat, the truth is that he still has a strong chance of pulling off a win in the election given the evidence and arguments that have been prepared both by his official legal team and by attorney Sidney Powell, who went solo in order to pursue a separate strategy than the one being used by Trump lawyer Rudy Giuliani.
As The New American has reported:
In her suit filed in Georgia this week, Powell explained that the ultimate objective of the vote riggers was to “illegally and fraudulently” manipulate the vote count so that Biden could appear to to be the winner. And this fraud was accomplished through various means, including lies, computer rigging, “old-fashioned ballot-stuffing,” and more that were all covered up using computer software programs created and run by foreign and domestic enemies.
Among the many pieces of evidence: a damning affidavit by a whistleblower who helped the late mass-murdering Socialist dictator Hugo Chavez of Venezuela create voting systems that could be rigged to favor a chosen candidate. Indeed, according to the suit, the software by Smartmatic was literally created for the purpose of rigging elections in a manner that would be impossible to prove or detect. And Smartmatic is closely linked to Dominion and other firms that were key in the 2020 election.
“Chavez was most insistent that Smartmatic design the system in a way that the system could change the vote of each voter without being detected,” the whistleblower explained under penalty of perjury. “He wanted the software itself to function in such a manner that if the voter were to place their thumb print or fingerprint on a scanner, then the thumbprint would be tied to a record of the voter’s name and identity as having voted, but that voter would not be tracked to the changed vote.”
Of course, the constant talking point from every establishment outlet from The New York Times to CNN to Fox New and beyond, is that “there is no evidence of widespread voter fraud.”
The adage goes that if you repeat a lie often enough, people will believe it’s true, and that appears to be the media’s tactic in “covering” the voter fraud issue. They continue to insist that there’s a lack of evidence, despite all the testimonial, statistical, and other forms of evidence that have been presented — and will be presented by Powell and the Trump team in the court of law. (Do they really expect lawyers to lay all their cards on the table in a press conference rather than before a judge? But that said, already-submitted lawsuits are packed with evidence; they only need to read the lawsuits and report them honestly.)
The left-wing media doesn’t want us to know about the massive evidence that exists. Nothing presented will ever constitute “real evidence” for them.
It appears that the only thing that will satisfy their ridiculously high standard of “evidence” is video footage of Joe Biden burning ballots in a giant box labeled “Trump votes”—and even then they would say it doesn’t prove a thing.
