When President G.W. Bush held a joint news conference with then-Mexican leader Felipe Calderon in 2007, he said while recounting his work with Calderon, “We discussed ways to make our nation safer.” (Emphasis added.) He did immediately correct himself and say “both nations safer,” but was this just a slip of the tongue by a notoriously poor speaker?
Or was it a Freudian slip revealing a hidden desire and, perhaps even, a secret agenda?
One man who believes it’s the latter is commentator Frank Miele. In a Monday piece titled “North America Goes South: The Plan To Dismantle USA,” Miele states what’s obvious to many: Our southern border’s collapse “can’t be” an accident.
The writer points out that Kamala Harris swears the border is “secure” even though illegal crossings have exploded to upwards of a million yearly. Clearly, the Biden administration is lying and, as Miele points out, a “lie is usually told to cover up some kind of bad behavior, some unacknowledged guilt or secretive misdeeds.” What could it be?
One obvious motivation is that the Democrats have long been importing voters. They well know that once migrants sneak into our country, are allowed to stay for years, and become settled, they generally will get amnesty. And once naturalized, such people have historically voted Democrats by a 70 to 90 percent margin. Yet there’s a darker (related) motivation as well, asserts Miele.
He mentions what The New American reported on October 17: The recent revelation that Secretary of State Antony Blinken had told Mexican President Andrés Manuel Lopez Obrador in September that he believed in “consolidating” Mexico, the U.S., and Canada. “In other words,” writes Miele, “the huge influx of Mexicans and other foreigners across the U.S. border is just the first stage in a globalist effort to blur the lines” among the three nations.
“It’s called the North American Union” (NAU), he continued — “and the idea has been around for three decades.”
Miele then mentioned Bush’s 2007 “our nation safer” slip and explains that while the NAU is sometimes still dismissed as a conspiracy theory, it’s actually a conspiracy fact. In fact, the globalists themselves have made this clear. As Miele explains:
Bush was an enthusiastic advocate of developing a strategic alliance between the U.S., Mexico, and Canada. Indeed, it was during a March 2005 summit at Bush’s Texas ranch that the leaders of the three countries agreed to create a Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America. This was followed within two months by a Council on Foreign Relations [CFR] white paper called “Building a North American Community.” The core of the proposal can be found in one sentence in the introduction that describe[s] the shared mission of Mexico, Canada, and the United States:
“Our economic focus should be on the creation of a common economic space that expands economic opportunities for all people in the region, a space in which trade, capital, and people flow freely.”
This “idea never went away,” Miele then states, but “just went underground.” He’s not kidding. Just consider “underground” 2013 comments Hillary Clinton made to Latin American bankers, brought above ground by WikiLeaks in 2016. “My dream,” she said, “is a hemispheric common market, with open trade and open borders, some time in the future … powering growth and opportunity for every person in the Hemisphere.”
So if this is Clinton’s dream, it’s a shared dream, as she simply presented the CFR white-paper line with rearranged and somewhat different words. What these people lack in originality they make up for with repetition.
Miele then concludes that, now, Biden’s open-border policy begins to make sense. “It is just the first step in ‘Building a North American Community’ — namely, ‘people flowing freely’ across borders,” he continues. “But for now the free flow of people only goes in one direction. That’s because, as long as the United States has a thriving economy, a safe environment, and a well-educated population, there is no way to sell the idea of a continental union to the American people.”
This is why you must first “devalue the United States by importing crime, drugs, and cheap workers, so that when the North American Union is ultimately proposed, it will be more palatable,” Miele elaborates. “After all, the cartels will already be controlling large swaths of both countries by then, and large streams of the U.S. economy will have been drained into Mexico.”
Do realize that, as has been said, “Demography is destiny.” The reason eastern European communists would sometimes move populations around is that revolts and other challenges to big-government control are less likely if you break down national/group cohesion and ensure a population consists mainly of atomized individuals who share only one commonality: membership in your “state.”
A similar phenomenon is apparent with the U.S.: Our foreign-born population (both legal and illegal) is now 47 million — approximately one out of every seven people in our country. This is a historical high for us and more than any other nation on Earth. The rate of immigration long ago exceeded the rate of assimilation, too.
As to this, a respondent (I believe via email) wrote me years ago and related what he was told when he tried teaching some Mexican-descent students American history. “We don’t care about this,” they said (I’m paraphrasing) — “We’re Mexican.”
This is the result, whether accidental or purposeful, of flooding a nation with people who “just come here for a better life,” which is a euphemistic way of saying “for money.” Of course, though, only accepting people who desperately want to become American, in every sense, is not part of the plan.
The John Birch Society has long worked to expose and stop a North American Union. To learn more on this topic, please explore the JBS.org Action Projects here, here, and here.
