Medical Op-Ed: Mass Vaccination Creates “Excellent Breeding Grounds” for COVID
AP Images
COVID-19 Vaccination
Article audio sponsored by The John Birch Society

“The COVID vaccines are proven to be too ineffective and unsafe at this time to warrant support for mass vaccination. This must be stopped and not even vulnerable persons should be vaccinated with these vaccines; definitely they should not be given to our children. For the latter, the costs are unacceptable,” argue prominent doctors.

In their lengthy medical op-ed on LifeSite News, Dr. Paul Alexander and Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche warn the public health decision makers that the mass vaccination program that uses “imperfect non-sterilizing vaccines” is “an excellent breeding grounds” for the emergence of “highly infectious variants that may eventually lead to more frequent and more pronounced pathogenicity.”

Stating that there are “very serious problems with these vaccines as you see around you,” such as the adverse reactions to the vaccines and their inefficiency in preventing the infections, the official medical advice from the nation’s top health agency, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) is expansion of vaccinations and now introduction of the booster shots.

The doctors wrote,

“They told you to get one jab, then two, then wear masks when jabbed, then social distance, too, then get a third jab. Now CDC is up front telling you that there is no difference between the vaccinated and unvaccinated in terms of being infected and even spreading the virus.”

Here, the doctors are likely referring to the recently published CDC study that found no statistically significant difference in transmission potential between vaccinated persons and persons who were not fully vaccinated.

At the same time, neither the vaccine manufacturers nor the federal regulators at the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) have conducted any studies on how the human immune system will respond to multiple boosting, which could potentially “catastrophically” impact public health.

While the pharmaceutical companies and the top government agencies touted that the vaccines will “end the pandemic,” it turned out that they will not.

While the “basic immunology teaches us that you can end the pandemic only if you cut the chain of transmission, and you do this with population-level herd immunity,” it cannot be achieved because of such inefficient vaccines, according to the doctors.

“With these COVID vaccines, we will never be able to reach herd immunity as the chain of transmission can never be cut,” argued the scientists. They explained that continuous transmission of the virus among the vaccinated people suggested that “the vaccines were sub-optimal, imperfect, and ‘leaky,”’ meaning they did not produce the strong immune response thus “sterilizing” the virus and preventing future re-infections.

The article reads,

“Mass vaccination only generates a widespread immunological environment that provides more infectious variants with a fitness/competitive advantage in the vaccinated population. We will, therefore, never be able to vaccinate ourselves out of this pandemic with these sub-optimal, i.e., leaky vaccines, and the virus will not spontaneously transit into endemicity as mass vaccination with Covid-19 vaccines will never generate herd immunity.”

The risk of viral immune escape can only be increased, the medics added, by applying such a vaccine for large-scale immunization programs (e.g., across all age groups). 

Citing the phenomenon of  antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) of disease potentially associated with COVID vaccines, the medical establishment “disregard the role of the vaccinated populations in the transmission of COVID virus, both to the vaccinated and the vulnerable unvaccinated persons.” Further, the published data out of Israel, the UK, the US, and elsewhere suggest that the fully vaccinated, in fact, may play a “potentially equal, if not superior” role in transmitting the virus. That medical fact is said to be a “consequence of a combination of immune pressure, infectious pressure, and the mass vaccine program during the midst of a pandemic with massive circulating pathogen.” The doctors stressed that the vaccinated people should not be stigmatized for that.

The article also mentions an alarming number of adverse reactions and deaths reported to the CDC’s VAERS database. As of November 26, there was a total of 927,738 reports. Of those, 19,532 are on death of the vaccine recipient, and 99,946 reported hospitalizations. The true number of post-injection adverse events is likely to be much higher, since VAERS only reflects “fewer than 1% of vaccine adverse events.”

That evidence requires decision-makers to alter their approach to the pandemic. At the same time, the public should focus on “improving your immune defense: first, by declining the shot  and, second, by improving innate immunity (via a healthy lifestyle, nutrition. etc.),” urge the scientists.

The article closes with the following conclusion:

“It is our opinion that a hard stop to this vaccine program is the only path forward, with an equally acute pivot to the use of chemoprophylaxis antivirals as well as for treatment of the infected. These current COVID vaccines are proving to be too unsafe with rapidly waning immunity to justify use.”

A medical study published last month in The Lancet corroborates those observations. Global vaccine rollouts have utterly failed to stop transmission of the COVID infections: Moreover, new data shows that infection is increasing in fully vaccinated individuals, argued Dr. Günter Kampf, a German specialist in hygiene and environmental medicine from the University of Greifswald.

“Many decisionmakers assume that the vaccinated can be excluded as a source of transmission. It appears to be grossly negligent to ignore the vaccinated population as a possible and relevant source of transmission when deciding about public health control measures,” wrote the scientist.

Countering Overreach Banner728