“I think there is a lot of voter fraud,” said one Alan Schulkin, caught on hidden video in 2016. Schulkin should know, too: A Democrat, he was at the time New York City’s commissioner of the Board of Elections.
Unfortunately, little has changed for the better since 2016. A case in point is a recent investigation by two experts that has found massive voter-database irregularities in another Democrat-run state: Illinois.
Data-analysis experts Ken and Jodie Zitko have taken their findings to the government, too, having filed a formal complaint on December 21 with Bernadette Matthews, director of the Illinois State Board of Elections. And what they’ve found, after close to 2,000 hours of investigation, is truly shocking. As commentator Jack Gleason relates:
- There were over 300,000 votes from the 2020 election missing or deleted from the Illinois voter data prior to the conclusion of the federal retention period of 22 months.
- Over a four-year period, Illinois population decreased by 150,000, while the voter roll increased by 650,000.
- Over 2.5 million people had votes cast prior to their registration dates.
- More than 230,000 registrations show seemingly Illegal or illogical registration dates.
- There are more than 4 million apparent registration violations out of 8.9 million registrations.
“This couple is not your ordinary pair of election sleuths,” either, Gleason continues. “Ken has been an MSSQL Data Analyst, DBA, and architect for 28 years, working with Fortune 50 companies, and Jodie has been working with ‘People Data’ and analytics since the mid-’90s in large enterprise environments. She’s a ‘subject matter expert’ in integrated workplace management systems.”
Gleason informs about how the Zitkos made their discoveries. While in a U.S. Senate candidate’s employ, the couple was able to access a copy of the Illinois State Board of Elections voter roll. Examining their own records within it, they found that while they’d never voted in a midterm election, the data indicated they’d voted in three of them; moreover, there was no record of the vote Ken did cast in the 2008 presidential election.
The Zitkos were then inspired to widen their investigation to others’ balloting history, and in the spring of 2022 they met with more than 1,300 Illinois residents who’d consented to an examination of their 20-year voting records. The result?
The irregularity rate was 57 percent, reports Gleason.
The findings include, he writes:
- votes cast when voters did not vote,
- votes missing when they did vote,
- voters registered and voting at addresses where they did not live, and
- registrations with illogical registration dates.
Shockingly and as with the Zitkos, fully 11 percent of these interviewees “had votes cast in their name for elections they did not participate in,” Gleason further states.
Know that this problem is neither new nor confined to Illinois. In fact, I reported on this voter-impersonator phenomenon back in 2005 in “Democrats and Deep Vote Fraud,” citing information given to me, exclusively, by a Washington, D.C., community leader. He told me that area-savvy political operatives called “block captains” or “apartment captains” — who know who won’t or can’t (e.g., because they’ve left the neighborhood) cast ballots themselves — will then vote, or have others do so, in these ex-residents’ stead.
(Note: I was still on the rolls when I left NYC almost 30 years ago. Anyone could’ve voted in my former precinct claiming to be “Selwyn Duke,” and no one would’ve been any the wiser. That’s how it is when there’s no voter ID required.)
Returning to the Zitkos’ investigation, Jodie said that learning of their electoral disenfranchisement was emotionally jarring for many interviewees. There were tears and trembling in certain cases, and one young man, upon discovering a “missing” 2020 vote, became deep red with rage and remained on-scene for about a half hour in a state of disbelief. One Illinois resident’s reaction to learning that fraudulent votes were case in her name for years is below.
In reality, however, vote-fraud incidents are long-standing and legion in America. For example, mail-in vote fraud was so bad in Paterson, New Jersey, during a May 12, 2020, special election between two Democrats that a judge ordered a new election be held. The following video outlines the ensuing vote-fraud charges.
A judge also had to order a new election late last year for the Democratic mayoral primary in Bridgeport, Connecticut, after ballot stuffing was exposed (video below).
Also last year, a Democrat in Mississippi accused another Democrat of vote fraud (video below).
And what follows is a sampling of headlines relating to our massive vote-fraud problem:
- Democrat Operative Admits: We’ve Been Rigging Elections “for 50 Years”
- Vote Fraud? Video Shows Man Stuffing Hundreds of Ballots Into Ballot Box
- Arizona and Nevada and the Slow-count Vote-fraud Technique
- Voter Fraud: Pennsylvania Democrats Caught Throwing Out Trump Votes
- Circumstantial Evidence of Vote Fraud?
- More Circumstantial Evidence of Vote Fraud: Arizona’s Numbers Don’t Add Up
- Voter Fraud in Georgia Senate Races
- L.A. Times Admits Illegals/Foreigners Influenced Election — to Help Democrats
- Vote Fraud? More Votes Than Voters in One-third of Detroit Precincts
Of course, we still hear — from ABC News in this video, for example — that there’s absolutely no evidence of “fraud that would have changed the outcome of the 2020 election.” Yes, just as something else is “safe and effective,” our elections are “safe and secure,” dontcha know? The winners of these suspect contests have told us so.
