Patrick Basham, the founding director of pollster Democracy Institute, added to the ever-growing list of election abnormalities and statistical improbabilities during his interview with Mark Levin on Sunday night.
Levin, on Fox News’ Life, Liberty and Levin, gave Basham extensive airtime to recount the additional election oddities that he has uncovered. On November 30, Basham initially called his discoveries “deeply puzzling.” On Sunday night he came closer to concluding that the U.S. 2020 presidential election was a carefully contrived and orchestrated fraud: “If you look at the results, you see how Donald Trump improved his national performance over 2016 by almost 20 percent. No incumbent president has ever lost a reelection bid if he’s increased his vote [total].”
{modulepos inner_text_ad}
He reviewed his previous discoveries, such as Trump winning 95 percent of the Republican vote and earning the highest share of all minority votes — black and Hispanic — for a Republican “since 1960.”
He pointed out in his November 30 article that with Trump’s extraordinary inroads into typically Democratic demographic strongholds “it is arithmetically impossible for a Democratic presidential candidate to win Florida, Arizona, Nevada and New Mexico.”
He confirmed how Biden’s win flies in the face of the bellwether states — Florida, Ohio, and Iowa — which “swung further in Trump’s direction than in 2016.”
He added:
Florida, Ohio and Iowa each defied America’s media polls with huge wins for Trump. Since 1852, only Richard Nixon has lost the Electoral College after winning this trio, and that 1960 defeat to John F. Kennedy is still the subject of great suspicion.
Midwestern states Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin always swing in the same direction as Ohio and Iowa, their regional peers. Ohio likewise swings with Florida. Current tallies show that, outside of a few cities, the Rust Belt swung in Trump’s direction.
And yet, by some mysterious statistical miracle, Biden won:
Yet, Biden leads in Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin because of an apparent avalanche of black votes in Detroit, Philadelphia, and Milwaukee. Biden’s “winning” margin was derived almost entirely from such voters in these cities, as coincidentally his black vote spiked only in exactly the locations necessary to secure victory. [Emphasis added.]
He did not receive comparable levels of support among comparable demographic groups in comparable states.
There was an additional “oddity”: “Biden won a record low of just 524 counties compared to the 873 counties President Obama won in 2008. Yet, Biden somehow outdid Obama in total votes.”
Basham saved the best for last: “non-polling metrics” that have a perfect record of predicting the outcome of the election. Those metrics include party registrations trends; the candidates’ respective primary votes; candidate enthusiasm; social-media followings; broadcast and digital media ratings; online searches; the number of (especially small) donors; and the number of individuals betting on each candidate.
Wrote Basham:
Non-polling metrics … have a 100 percent record. Every non-polling metric forecast Trump’s reelection.
For Trump to lose this election, the mainstream polls needed to be correct, which they were not.
Furthermore, for Trump to lose, not only did one or more of these metrics have to be wrong for the first time ever, but every single one had to be wrong, and at the very same time. [Emphasis added.]
Despite Basham’s reluctance to tell Levin that these oddities and abnormalities were the result of fraud, Sidney Powell, one of Trump’s attorneys investigating the election fraud, was not so reticent. As she continued to peel back the layers of the onion concealing the election fraud, she stated:
There has been a massive and coordinated effort to steal this election from We The People of the United States of America to delegitimize and destroy votes for Donald Trump … to manufacture votes for Joe Biden.
They’ve done it in every way imaginable, from having dead people vote in record numbers, to absolutely fraudulently creating ballots that exist only for voting for Biden.
If fairness and honesty are still important in this country, it’s just a matter of time before this increasingly overwhelming evidence of election fraud returns the president to the White House for a second term.
One question remains: In light of the blatant fraud now obvious to any observer, why the massive fraud in the first place? Did not the insiders know that their efforts would be found out and exposed? Did they really think it could escape the attention of sleuths such as Basham and Powell and others?
If they did know they would be found out, why did they persist anyway? A speculative answer to that question is that they simply assumed the fraud would be too overwhelming to prove in a short span of time and that a Biden administration would make sure that no fraudsters are penalized.
Related article:
