If one million illegal migrants enter a nation over time and just one-tenth of one percent are or will become jihadists, that’s 1,000 dangerous terrorists. And with hundreds of thousands of illegals having already entered the United States just since Joe Biden took office, well, what do you think probability dictates terrorism-wise for us?
That illegal migration is a conduit for terrorists is not conjecture. Illegals in the terrorism database have already been intercepted by Customs and Border Patrol, and an Islamic jihadist who snuck into the United States via our southern open door to Mexico later committed a terrorist act up in Canada in 2017.
Then there’s the coronavirus, which is just COVID-19 for illegals but COVID-1984 for the rest of us. That is, citizens must prove they’re SARS-CoV-2 negative before traveling, and the great, all-knowing Fao Chi tells us we must remain masked and distanced and accept the new (ab)normal. Yet the Biden administration has been shipping China virus-positive aliens throughout our country because it seems that diseases, like laws, are only for the little people. (Illegals aren’t shipped into the pseudo-elites’ neighborhoods, which still look like the set of Leave it to Beaver.)
But Biden has learned well. His ex- (and perhaps present?) boss Barack Obama also shipped disease-carrying aliens throughout our country. In fact, experts said in 2014 that Chagas Disease, leprosy, malaria, and other illnesses historically rare in the United States had become more prevalent because of Third World immigration. There’ve also been migration-linked outbreaks of drug-resistant tuberculosis and Dengue fever. Then there was the Obama-era Enterovirus D68 emergence in the United States; the disease was associated with paralysis in children and also was likely introduced by migrants.
In addition, illegal aliens also commit an inordinate percentage of serious crimes such as rape and murder. And all the aforementioned problems intensify when, à la the Biden administration, the borders are opened to the world. Elections have consequences — stolen ones especially so.
CD Media made this point Monday, writing of Invasion USA, “The overwhelming majority of America did not vote for this.”
In fact, very few Americans did. It’s not just that there’s strong evidence President Trump won a significant majority of legitimate votes, either. Even most of those casting Democrat ballots weren’t told there’d be, and didn’t desire, a Democrat-facilitated illegal-alien invasion. But this again brings us back to Duke’s First Rule of Politics:
Under representative government, people do not get what they want.
They get what they vote for.
As to what a significant minority of Americans voted for and a minuscule minority stole votes for, CD Media also writes, “Evidence has been recently shown that in addition to hundreds of thousands of migrants being transported all over the United States, terrorists are also freely walking across the border.”
“The Biden White House is laughing in our face as they increase the flow of migrants, then shipping [sic] them in unmarked vehicles into your communities nation-wide,” the site continues mere words later.
And why is this happening? If you think it’s related to Democrats’ desire to import voters — as 70 to 90 percent of illegal aliens cast Democrat ballots upon being naturalized via amnesties (and sometimes before) — my, aren’t you the cynical one.
You’re also the astute one. In fact, the shipping of illegals throughout the United States may be motivated by more than just a desire to hide the border crisis’s magnitude. This reality brings us back to a 2015 report by a radio personality named Sue Payne.
While being interviewed by radio host Mark Levin, Payne warned of a secret Obama administration plan to use new illegal aliens as “seedlings” that will develop a “country within a country.” These foreigners will “navigate, not assimilate,” as they eventually “take over the host,” coming “out of the shadows” and “pushing the citizens into the shadows,” she said.
Payne stated that she got this information via three 2015 conference calls involving Obama administration officials that she, unbeknownst to them, was party to. Addressing the scheme to use illegals to effect Democrat-power-enhancing demographic change, she told Levin, among other things, that
eventually the seedlings will take over the host. And the immigrants will come out of the shadows, and what I got from the meetings was that they would be pushing the citizens into the shadows. They would be taking over the country; in fact, one of the members of the task force actually said that we would be developing a country within a country. There was a couple of buzz words that were really disturbing to hear; that was one of them. One was from the White House spokesman [who] said that “immigrants need to be made aware of the benefits they are entitled to,” which led to another comment saying that this group that Obama is going to pardon or give amnesty to would not be interested in assimilating — they would navigate, not assimilate.
Though I’ve no reason to doubt Payne, I can’t vouch for her report’s authenticity. But here’s why it doesn’t matter:
Whether her conference-call claim is true or not, what it describes is precisely what’s happening. The Left is applying the principle: If you can’t get the people to change the government, change the people.
This occurs all over the West. Liberals acknowledge it during their (rare) honest moments, too, but never more bluntly than did Andrew Neather, former advisor to ex-British prime minister Tony Blair. In 2009, Neather actually admitted that the previous 15 years’ massive Third World immigration into the United Kingdom was orchestrated by his Labour Party to “rub the Right’s nose in diversity and render their arguments out of date.”
As for Invasion USA, the only question about it is whether our leftists learned from the Brits or the Brits learned from them.
Anyway, if you think importing a foreign army to seize total power sounds like treason, now, now, don’t intensify your cynic status. Today, citizen, we call that “nation-strengthening ‘diversity.’”
