House Republican Leader John Boehner (Ohio) announced on November 1 that his party is preparing a healthcare reform bill to compete with the Democratic alternative.

Boehner said the Republican version would cover millions of presently uninsured Americans, but it would not be as ambitious as the House Democratic proposal brought out last week. The Democratic plan is estimated to bring coverage to more than 30 million uninsured Americans at a 10-year price tag of $1.055 trillion.

“What we do is we try to make the current system work better,” Boehner mentioned on CNN's State of the Nation. The plan is expected to be less expensive and to feature less government meddling with the private sector. According to Boehner, it will take “a step-by-step approach” to expanding coverage.

The Republican bill will offer grants for states that come up with “innovative” ways to expand coverage. As an example, he talked about states that have established “high-risk pools” to help individuals with pre-existing conditions to obtain health insurance.

Other features of the GOP alternative would be new limits on medical malpractice lawsuits and provisions that enable individuals and small businesses to more easily combine their purchasing power for insurance coverage. Boehner stated that the Republican legislation won’t raise taxes, and it won’t have any mandates to force individuals or businesses to purchase insurance.

Republicans have criticized Democratic plans, but they now hope to show that there is a better way. They intend to bring up the their measure during debate on the Democratic bill. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) has indicated that this would be allowed.

Even some diehard liberals are looking for a better alternative to Democrats' proposals. Senator Joseph Lieberman (I-Conn.) on November 1 reiterated his opposition to creating a new government-run public health-insurance plan. He said he wouldn’t try to block debate on the Democratic bill, but he would join the Republicans if they move to block a vote on the bill.

The more opposition there is to a public plan, the better. All a government-run option would have to do to put private insurance out of business is reimburse healthcare providers at Medicare rates. Healthcare providers would then charge private insurance companies higher rates to cover their losses.

When private insurers are hit with these rates, they in turn charge higher premiums to their customers. These customers eventually find they can’t afford private coverage anymore and turn to the public plan. The steady exodus from private coverage would only increase the pressure on those who remain. The public plan is unfairly guaranteed to win in the end.

It remains to be seen if the Republicans can provide a worthy alternative to what the Democrats are offering. While there are likely to be some downsides, almost anything without a public option and without federal mandates would be better than current Democratic proposals.

For a relatively short but informative video full of ideas that would really reform healthcare, watch the following interview of Ron Paul on CNN. As a teaser, those who watch the video all the way to the end may find a new way to reform their relationships with the opposite sex as well.

 

Photo: AP Images

TrackBack URI for this entry

Comments (4)

Subscribe to this comment's feed

Bonnie said:

	... Oh! At last, the Great Republican Party is coming to save us! They KNOW the Democrats intend to figuratively "slice our throats, left to right". Hence, they produce a bill to save us all. They KNOW it would be better if it were done "right to left". Republicrats, Demoplicans... I have no use for either. NO SOCIALIZED MEDICINE! NO HEALTHCARE BILL --- OF ANY KIND!
	report abuse vote down vote up

November 03, 2009
Votes: +4

David S. said:

Existing GOP Healthcare Bill calls for Biometric ID's & nation-wide medical database The Republicans already have a bill, HR 2520, the so-called "Patient's Protection Act". Hidden within free-market rhetoric, that bill calls for both a biometric identifier for all Medicare recipients and a nationwide database for your medical informaton!! (H/t CCHC comparison chart and Institute for Health Freedom.) Once the fedgov mandates the digitization and standardization of medical information, our personal data will surely and swiftly be collected by Washington DC -- no matter the paper promises of privacy. It's inevitable. And with that data, plus our dollars, they will literally make life and death decisions. We need to be on the lookout for the same poison in the new Republican bill. DRS

report abuse vote down vote up

November 04, 2009
Votes: +0

Supra Skytop said:

	... Hi! I like your srticle and I would like very much to read some more information on this issue. Will you post some more? As we know , we can find lots of fans ,lots of store have been open worldwide.
	report abuse vote down vote up

November 04, 2009 | url
Votes: -1

cranky yankee said:

... "They intend to bring up the their measure during debate on the Democratic bill." Yuh, right, on the Democratice bill that the Republi-CONS voted unanimously to block. So exactly when are they planning to bring up this "miracle bill." "All a government-run option would have to do to put private insurance out of business is reimburse healthcare providers at Medicare rates. Healthcare providers would then charge private insurance companies higher rates to cover their losses." Uh, the insurance companies are already underpaying the health care providers. That's part of the problem and the cause of the vicious circle. They underpay the providers, the providers then up their costs (and the "patient responsibility" part) so that the insurers will pay more, but the insurers pay less, and so the circle goes on ad infinitum. Frankly, if the Republi-CONS don't think it can be addressed with a tax cut, they refuse to think about it. Wouldn't want to over tax their brains. I'm just saying...

report abuse vote down vote up

November 23, 2009
Votes: -1