| High Army Suicide Rate & U.S. Foreign Policy | | Print | |
| Written by Bruce Walker | ||||||||
| Thursday, 19 November 2009 07:38 | ||||||||
|
The high suicide rate is related, in part, to the enormous stress of working in a job that involves almost daily life-and-death decisions. Overseas deployment in a foreign land and culture entailing long periods of separation from family is also a factor. What does President Obama see as the ultimate purpose of our troops in Afghanistan? How about our continued military involvement in Iraq? How does he define victory in Afghanistan or Iraq — or in the whole Middle East region? Why is the United States propping up with American blood and treasure an Afghan regime rife with corruption that has repeatedly expressed its support for the radical Islamic Iranian regime? Will President Obama decide to expand the "war against terror" by invading Iran, even as he continues to support the Afghan regime? More importantly, should a single man, even the President of the United States, be able to decide when to thrust our soldiers into the crucible of war? Should he even use our troops for "nation building" or, in general, to intervene in the affairs of other nations? And when troops are used for purposes other than defending their homes and country, with vaguely defined objectives and with no end in sight, is it surprising that the problems of stress and morale in the military would skyrocket? And is it also reasonable to conclude that these heightened problems may be a contributing factor to the climbing suicide rate in the Army? Obviously, as our Middle East quagmire continues and even deepens, a growing number of soldiers must realize that something is terribly wrong with the sacrifices they have been ordered to make. Undoubtely many do not even realize that under our Constitutiion the Congress must declare war (that is, the decision is not the President's to make) — or that George Washington and other Founding Fathers recommended staying clear of foregin quarrels. If there were greater awareness of this among the soldiers — and the American people as a whole — there would also be a greater understanding that something is seriouslly wrong with U.S. foreign policy.
Set as favorite
Email This
Trackback(0)
Comments (2)
![]()
TH Haxx
said:
|
|
Locke What do you mean why are we there? We are there because a hostile corporate takeover didn't succeed. We are there because assassination attempts did not succeed. We are there because the "money that be" sent in their military strength to coerce Iraq and Afghanistan into taking on heavy loans and economic development that will subject them to American firms like Bechtel, Halliburton, Chase, and the world banking organizations. Both countries hold extremely important strategic value to the underground exercise of empire building in their particular regions. Iraq is the seat of the middle east. Afghanistan is the gate to all things Islam. Hands down it comes to two important and vital concepts, money and power. |
|
Thomas Paine
said:
|
Jo you suck at acting Jo what a lame attempt to sound like an arab terrorist. Go take your drugs. The War on Terror is a fraud. The NWO wants all the oil. ($20 trillion of known reserves in Iraq at $60 per barrel -source Time Magazine). Our constitution is being burned by communists pretending to be patriots. Communist China wants our 200 million citizens to be slaves like their 1 billion, so the world elite can do as they please. US military will be the military of the NWO. |
|




Reuters and other media organs have 
