| The Jihadists in America | | Print | |
| Written by Selwyn Duke | ||||
| Monday, 21 December 2009 00:00 | ||||
|
And it's in upstate New York. Bob Unruh reports on the story at WorldNetDaily.com, writing: There are episodes [in the video] of what appears to be automatic weapons fire at a target and incidents in which a handgun is held point-blank at a "victim's" head.... The video also exposes the brazen propaganda used by MOA. It features an MOA representative claiming that the organization conducted a census and stating, “We are 100 percent sure that Muslims are the majority in America. Our Islamic political party has based its manifesto on this fact. Therefore, we want to declare once and for all that America is our country.” "We are fighting to destroy the enemy. We are dealing with evil at its roots and its roots are America," declares Giliani [sic]. One “infidel” thus handled was Wall Street Journal South Asia Bureau Chief Daniel Pearl, who was beheaded in 2002 by Islamists. In the fateful hour of his kidnapping, he was on his way to what he believed was an interview with Gilani. It also won’t come as a shock to blogger and U.S. war veteran Scott Grayban. After posting a Canada Free Press Islamberg exposé on his website, blog.borgnet.us, he received a death threat via two phone calls. They were from a foreigner who was able to hide his location by hacking into a phone line. Yet this story will come as a shock to most Americans, as the mainstream media has given Islamberg, its sister compounds and MOA precious little coverage. This is due to political correctness. And, tragically, according to CAN’s president Martin Mawyer, this force is handicapping authorities as well. Writes Bob Unruh, “The hands of law enforcement and investigators are tied at this point, he [Mawyer] said, because members of the organization are part of ‘a minority religion,’ ‘they are African-American’ ‘and in this particular case [Islamberg video], are women.’” This is no doubt true. It’s why, I suppose, we have to rely on unnamed sources for the truth.
Set as favorite
Email This
Trackback(0)
Comments (1)
![]()
Mikey Pinkie-Rings
said:
|
|
Mr. Duke, your point is...? Perhaps I missed it, but there seems to be a missing point to this story. Yes, we can all find our own conclusions based upon our preconceived notions of the stereotypes. However, what might make for better investigative journalism is additional context, giving the reader a better understanding of whether this is systemically a problem leading to religious warfare, religious discrimination, or just plain old-fashioned discrimination. |
|




It is a bucolic region of verdant meadows, rolling hills, and babbling brooks, a largely peaceful place where big city hustle and bustle and crime are very far away. Yet, like a pig in a beauty contest, within this pastoral setting lies something incongruent: a Jihadist training center. In this compound, women are taught to slit throats and mount assault-weapon attacks and, presumably, some brand of Islamic piety is the order of the day. But this place isn’t found in the Mideast’s Fertile Crescent or in sub-Saharan Africa. It's name is Islamberg. It's in the town of Hancock.
