| Supreme Court to Decide if Cross Violates Constitution | | Print | |
| Written by Rebecca Terrell | ||||||||||||||||
| Wednesday, 07 October 2009 21:00 | ||||||||||||||||
|
Ironically, the person who originally brought the case in California federal court, retired National Park Service employee Frank Buono, describes himself as a Christian, but said he was offended when the government denied a request to have a Buddist memorial erected nearby. When the Court ordered the Park Service to remove the cross, Congress decided to sell the acre of land on which it stands to the local Veterans of Foreign Wars (VFW) chapter, the same group that erected the monument in 1934. Congress also withheld funds for removal of the cross and designated it a national memorial. An appeals court invalidated the 2004 land transfer, and the cross was covered with a large plywood box, awaiting final ruling. The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), representing Buono, has now appealed to the Supreme Court, which heard opening arguments on Wednesday. The more conservative justices seemed appeased by the sale of the land, but the more liberal of the court were not satisfied because the monument would retain its designation as a national memorial, thereby insinuating government endorsement and blurring the line separating church and state. The public-interest law firm, American Center for Law and Justice (ACLJ), issued an amicus brief in June citing the support of 15 members of Congress. In it, the ACLJ points out that, in keeping with similar Supreme Court rulings, Buono never had standing to bring the case in the first place since he was merely an "offended observer." It argued that offended observer standing is flawed since it could be so easily abused by both individuals and the courts. The brief went on to say that in cases like these, the only "injury" is to the sensibilities of the plaintiffs, which should logically be grounds for dismissal. The Supreme Court, contrary to its own rulings on similar cases, decided to uphold the original court's judgment in favor of Buono's legitimate standing. It will likely be months before a final decision is handed down. VFW National Commander Glen Gardner warned in a press release that this case could set a dangerous precedent for national veterans' monuments. He said, "The ACLU will not be satisfied with the removal of this one memorial. If the Ninth Circuit’s decision is allowed to stand, countless other similar veterans memorials will be endangered." Photo: AP Images
Set as favorite
Email This
Trackback(0)
Comments (4)
![]()
still free
said:
|
|
The hypocrites! Meanwhile back at the ranch ... The religious statues, crosses and the Ten Commandments across America are coming down, one case at a time. Yet mosques are proliferating. Certain municipal airports now have footbaths for certain "religious" groups. Could we put up a cross in an airport? Soon every religious group will be represented except for Christians. Get Involved and Help us in the Fight to: Follow the Constitution! Audit, then Abolish, the Fed! Audit, then Abolish. ACORN! Bring our boys home! Get us out of the UN! Leave our Health Care alone! Leave our 2nd Amendment alone! Stop killing innocent babies! Most importantly, if you are not already a member, join JBS! If you cannot be active, send a donation! |
|
Flu-Bird
said:
|
typical two faced hypotcrits While they blabber about crosses in public areas they dont make such a fuss over pagan idols and art in the same public areas like the QUETZALCOATYLE in SAN DIEGO or the satanic idols and temples around this nation |
|
Bonnie
said:
|
... There is coming a day when the Cross (actually, the Person whom the Cross represents) will be judging the Supreme Court and the ACLU. There will be no appeal. |
|
Flu-Bird
said:
|
The ultimate judge GOD is the ultimate judge and oneday all these ACLU crooks and imperial judges will stand at the pearly gates and be judged themselves |
|




The fate of an 8-foot tall Latin Cross in the 
