A Brief History of Government Immunizations | Print |  E-mail
Written by Alex Newman   
Tuesday, 15 September 2009 14:45

immunizationsAs the start of the federal government’s most ambitious vaccination program approaches, it is worth taking a second look at the history of similar campaigns in the past. Since most of the media and government health officials constantly laud vaccine successes, this article will dwell more on the stories that are not as widely disseminated.

The results of many past mass inoculation efforts have been severely criticized, and are cited by some health experts as another reason for — at the very least — exercising extreme caution. In addition to outright catastrophes that are attributed to vaccines and government mandates, some medical experts say the benefits are dubious at best.  

The most relevant and frequently cited example is the mass immunization program of 1976 against a supposed outbreak of the swine flu virus. After some recruits at Fort Dix in New Jersey contracted the illness, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices of the United States Public Health Service recommended that the population be vaccinated. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the federal government decided it was necessary to spend almost $150 million to immunize “every man, woman and child.” 

Following a massive government propaganda operation similar to the one being witnessed today, millions of Americans dutifully lined up to get their shot. It was safe, effective, and necessary, Big Brother assured the populace. But government officials lied.

By the time the dust had settled, only one person’s death had been linked to the swine flu, while hundreds of deaths and thousands of grave neurological disorders were attributed to the vaccine. The campaign was suspended after just 10 weeks as the reports of side effects — often fatal — continued to pour in from around the country.

The “pandemic” never materialized, but since the government had agreed to exempt vaccine manufacturers from liability (much like today), taxpayers were on the hook for billions in damages. One of the most common horrors and widely reported consequences of the immunization was the emergence of the paralyzing neurological disease known as Guillain-Barre syndrome (GBS) in some inoculated Americans. Documents prove the CDC knew about the potential for these effects, but citizens were never informed. A CBS 60 Minutes investigation also revealed that the government had even lied in claims it made that certain well-known figures had taken the vaccine.

But in addition to the 1976 “fiasco,” as it was dubbed, a wide variety of other government vaccination debacles have been highlighted by medical experts and opponents of the swine flu vaccine. Several, for example, point to the outbreak of smallpox in the 1920s and a court case dealing with the issue. Dr. True Ott wrote in a widely publicized article entitled "Vaccine-induced Disease Epidemic Outbreaks" that the spread of smallpox was actually caused by the government vaccine, which used live viruses.

“The Protective Bureau proved in court that there was no epidemic before the vaccinations,” he said, referring to the watchdog group Advertiser’s Protective Bureau in Kansas City, Missouri, and the smallpox epidemic in the early twenties. “The court record on this case is very clear. In the weeks and months following the ‘mass vaccinations’ ­ the area's hospital beds were filled to over-flowing with vaccine-induced smallpox cases.”   

Ian Sinclair, an author and vaccination researcher who has studied the issues for over 20 years, points to a slew of other cases of immunization schemes that in retrospect turned out to be disastrous. He provides compelling historical examples from a variety of sources, noting that he believes vaccines are “biological poisons” that offer no protection whatsoever and are actually a contributing factor in disease.   

When the German government rolled out its compulsory immunization against diphtheria in 1940, there were 40,000 reported deaths from the illness, Sinclair notes. By 1945, 250,000 people had died from the disease. Sweden stopped its whooping cough vaccination program in 1979 when it was discovered that 84 percent of the children who fell ill from the disease had been vaccinated against it three times. And a study published in 1994 in the New England Journal of Medicine noted that more than 80 percent of American children under five with whooping cough had been fully vaccinated.   

A 1970s vaccine study in India revealed that tuberculosis occurred more often in people who had taken the shot than in those who had not. In the United Kingdom, Sinclair points out that the Community Disease Surveillance Center acknowledges over 200,000 cases of whooping cough in fully vaccinated children between 1970 and 1990. An outbreak of polio in Oman in the late 1980s struck hardest in areas where vaccination was widespread.

And back to the United States again; in 1977 the developer of the first polio vaccine, Dr. Jonas Salk, testified with other scientists that the cause of most polio cases in the United States since 1961 was the inoculation itself. A revealing 1990 article about measles in the Journal of the American Medicine Association pointed out that: "Although more than 95% of school-aged children in the US are vaccinated against measles, large measles outbreaks continue to occur in schools and most cases in this setting occur among previously vaccinated children."

This is just a small sampling of the damning body of evidence mounting against the cause of vaccinations and their government sponsors. Sinclair highlights many more examples, and other experts have created lists of their own. There is a massive amount of information available about these issues, so it is certainly worth considering in light of the new swine flu program — especially with the revelations that it has been fast-tracked through safety tests under the guise of an “emergency.”

But the pandemic announcement by the World Health Organization (WHO), which ushered in the so-called emergency, deserves some historical perspective as well.

Unbeknownst to most people, the definition of what constitutes a pandemic was changed quietly by the WHO earlier this year. The change was dramatic: No longer did the disease have to create “enormous numbers” of deaths and illness to be considered a pandemic, now it just had to be a new strain for which humans have no immunity. The repercussions of the heightened state of emergency can be dramatic, but this will be a topic for another time.

Another bit of historical information worth considering is a past prediction by global health officials that proved to be way off the mark, to say the least. In September of 2005, the head of the United Nations’ bird flu preparations estimated that the “epidemic” could cause up to 150 million human deaths. So far, the WHO has confirmed slightly more than 250.

The WHO has also been accused of sparking the AIDS epidemic in Africa via its smallpox vaccination campaign. “I thought it was just a coincidence until we studied the latest findings about the reactions which can be caused by Vaccinia,” a WHO advisor told the London Times in an article entitled "Smallpox vaccine ‘triggered Aids virus.’’  “Now I believe the smallpox vaccine theory is the explanation to the explosion of Aids.” The article continued by noting that: “The greatest spread of HIV infection coincides with the most intense immunization programmes.”

The global health “authorities” have made plenty of other significant blunders and miscalculations as well. In 1967, the WHO declared that Ghana was measles-free after 96 percent of the population was vaccinated. But just five years later, the country suffered its most deadly outbreak of the disease. 

So while governments like to take credit for success in eradicating disease and protecting the public, this is not generally the reality. In fact, governments and their programs often cause disasters under the guise of caring for citizens, and improved health has much more to do with other factors — like improved hygiene, capitalism, freedom, and the higher standard of living those entail.  

“Most people believe that victory over the infectious diseases of the last century came with the invention of immuni[z]ations,” writes Dr. Andrew Weil in Health and Healing. “In fact, cholera, typhoid, tetanus, diphtheria and whooping cough, etc. were in decline before vaccines for them became available — the result of better methods of sanitation, sewage disposal, and distribution of food and water."

It is clear that the swine flu vaccine carries risks and that governments do not have a stellar track record when it comes to the healthcare business or vaccination programs — or anything really. The disease also seems relatively mild thus far.

Americans should carefully educate themselves regarding the disease and the vaccine — considering the risks of both. But no matter what happens, the government should cease its propaganda and the mass vaccination campaign, with everything that involves. It must obey the Constitution and allow citizens to make their own decisions with their families and doctors.

Trackback(0)
Comments (7)add comment

jagat said:

0
indian govt-swine flu
by the time wen India produces swine flu vaccine the toll may cross atleast 500 by next year march. let India produce it. but in this scenario govt can order for vaccines for affected areas like karnataka especially bangalore and Pune. is there any deal b/n govt and institutes of india and govt that india has to get the vaccine only from them?? even govt has to think not to wait for increasing market share of indian medicine institutes rather than saving lives. this is not the way to controlling population in India.smilies/angry.gif what is the exactt reason??
 
September 17, 2009
Votes: +2

Teresa Binstock said:

0
thimerosal in flu- and H1N1-vaccinations
Two recently announced findings raise concern about policies whereby thimerosal-containing vaccines will be injected into humans. Two researchers from Stony Brook medical cchool (NY) have found that boys who had received thimerosal-containing HepB vaccinations as infants (a) were 9 times as likely to be receiving special-ed services some years later, and (b) were three times as likely to have autism (1-2).

[1] Hepatitis B triple series vaccine and developmental disability in US children aged 1-9 years. Gallagher C, Goodman M. Toxicol Environ Chem 2008 90(5):997-1008. {free online}
http://fourteenstudies.org/pdf/hep_b.pdf

[2] HEPATITIS B VACCINATION OF MALE NEONATES AND AUTISM
CM Gallagher, MS Goodman, Graduate Program in Public Health, Stony Brook University Medical Center, Stony Brook, NY
Annals of Epidemiology Vol. 19, No. 9 ABSTRACTS (ACE)
September 2009: p659.


 
September 18, 2009
Votes: +0

Lenny Walshe said:

0
One of the few articles out there urging caution against swine flu vaccine
Thanks Alex. Is the main stream media completely controlled by Big Pharma? It's disgusting. Time to cancel your cable TV subscriptions and log on to The New American for some real world reporting. The squalene in the vaccines can also be detrimental to health. Do not give these vaccines to your children if you have half a brain!!
 
September 18, 2009
Votes: +3

Paula said:

0
...
"SURE YOU CAN TRUST THE GOVERNMENT" JUST ASK A NATIVE AMERICAN INDIAN!!!!!
 
September 23, 2009
Votes: -1

Always American said:

0
Sounds like Genocide
Oh my God!

This is shocking, especially the explosion of Aids in Africa.

And the new definition of pandemic?

Lord have Mercy.
 
September 28, 2009
Votes: +0

jgkfdjgkjd said:

October 06, 2009 | url
Votes: +0

Samara said:

0
hi, we are from the government and we are here to help.
That is the scariest phrase in the English Language, followed closely by,
"we must enforce this policy, for the good of _______ . . ."
the planet, the citizens, the country, the world, etc...
 
October 11, 2009
Votes: +0

Write comment
This content has been locked. You can no longer post any comment.

busy