| Obama’s Speech to the Children of America | | Print | |
| Written by Selwyn Duke | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Sunday, 06 September 2009 02:00 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
People are divided as to whether the presidential message should be broadcast in school, and some school districts have already opted not to air it. Writes The Wall Street Journal: The reaction against the speech has caused most schools to make viewing of the speech optional. In Mr. Obama's home state of Illinois, more than a dozen school districts won't air the speech. Chicago public school officials are offering alternate activities for children who don't watch the speech, after getting a mixed reaction from parents. Lonny Lemon, superintendent of predominantly Republican Quincy Public School District 172 in Quincy, Ill., said dozens of callers were roughly split. "They were very passionate, pro or con," Mr. Lemon said. "There was no middle ground. I heard, 'This is socialistic,' 'It's going to be Hitler.'" Mr. Lemon's district schools will not air the speech. Additionally, school districts in northern Texas won’t devote class time to the speech, either. The stated goal of the talk is to encourage students to achieve their educational goals, which certainly sounds innocuous enough. But the lesson plans initially meant to accompany the speech raised eyebrows and alarm. Students were to write letters to themselves explaining how they could “help the president,” and the materials asked questions such as, “What is the president trying to tell me?” “What is the president asking me to do?” and “What is President Obama inspiring you to do?” Clearly, the answer to the last question is not expected to be “nothing.” I must emphasize that the DOE has now revised the lesson plan. For instance, students will no longer be asked to explain how they could help the president; instead, they will be told to “Write letters to themselves about how they can achieve their short‐term and long‐term education goals.” Yet there is an obvious question: if the aim was to inspire students to build a culture of academics, why was there so much focus on Obama until there was public outcry? John F. Kennedy’s famous challenge was, “Ask not what your country can do for you. Ask what you can do for your country.” He did not say, “Ask not what your president can do for you. Ask what you can do for your president.” Do we want to inspire children to serve their fellow man — or just a certain man? Yet it cannot be understood why the specifics of this event are so unsettling without discussing the general flavor of today’s events. Many will point out that Obama’s speech is not unprecedented, as many presidents have spoken to the young. But this is a harder sell when it was his own DOE that called the event “historic.” And while such terminology can be chalked up to the hyperbole of salesmanship, the speech actually is unprecedented in a very real way. When Ronald Reagan addressed students in 1986, he was charming but also a distant figure. And I don’t mean in terms of personality. He was simply the kindly old man who gave your son a gentle smile, a pat on the back, said a few nice words and then went on his way. He wasn’t that guy in the park who just seemed so, so interested in your kids that, well, you knew there was an ulterior motive. That is to say, Reagan was a figure firmly identified with small government and local control; heck, in 1980 he had actually promised to eliminate the DOE as a cabinet post. Hardly anyone suspected him of trying to micromanage education and make it a tool of the federal government — never mind of trying to indoctrinate children. But whether you like Obama or not, there is no denying that he represents quite the opposite. He believes in centralized control, in top-down management; he would increase the DOE’s scope, power and influence over school curricula (which means influencing the values students are taught). You may agree with this goal, but understand the perspective of the millions of Americans who do not. When they hear that a federal government chief executive who advocates greatly increased federal power plans to speak to schoolchildren, it seems more machination than inspiration. They have watched Obama give us stimulus after stimulus and partially nationalize auto companies, insurers and banks. Now they fear that he next wants to nationalize their children’s minds. Moreover, Obama isn’t just another politician. He is the first cool, youthful, post-WWII generation president, and he had connected with the young like no other leader in memory. All during the 2008 campaign, the buzz was about the “youth vote,” about how the young were excited and would finally swarm the polls and vault Obama into office. We also know how impressionable youth are. An endearing quality of children is that they can easily be made to believe anything; they are a beautiful swath of humanity unstained by cynicism and characterized by trust. And they are this way because it makes them easy to mold, and molded they must be. Yet it’s dangerous when this wet clay falls into the wrong hands, those of a potter who would create broken vessels. A case in point was presented in a very good Fox News program Friday night about political correctness, entitled “Do You Know What Textbooks Your Children are Really Reading?” The case concerned one classroom in which young children were asked to judge whether Christopher Columbus deserved a holiday. They then were assailed with a litany of his sins to the exclusion of his triumphs. The result? Every single child said Columbus did not deserve a holiday. For these reasons — Obama’s appeal to youth and seeming desire to place the focus on himself, children’s naiveté and malleability, and the president’s centralization doctrine and belief in big government — it’s easy to see why parents are uneasy about letting this stranger bounce their children on his lap. Many Americans still want a government that’s going to leave them alone, and Obama just seems too interested. Too interested in our businesses, tax money, CO2 emissions, medical care and now, many fear, too interested in our kids.
Set as favorite
Email This
Trackback(0)
Comments (14)
Bonnie
said:
|
Whether or not President Barack Obama’s September 8 back-to-school speech will be “historic” as his Department of Education (DOE) states, it certainly is headline grabbing. His talk is currently the talk of the nation, but thus far the only historic aspect of it is the opposition it has inspired.
TrackBack URI for this entry
Subscribe to this comment's feed |
Step 2 This "speech" on the importance of education is step 1. Get the children committed to "helping themselves" (not to mention, coming to know and trust their "respected leader"). Step 2. Get the children interested in "helping others" by reporting "suspicious behaviors" for the benefit of society and the country. Perhaps this is where the snitch line will come into play again. http://www.thenewamerican.com/...iland/1819 |
Mike Licht
said:
 |
Teachable Momement After the President of the United States speaks to school children about the value of education, Republicans will make opposing comments extolling ignorance. See: http://notionscapital.wordpress.com/2009/09/04/obamas-dangerous-message-to-our-children/ |
Bonnie
said:
|
Don't be fooled Whenever the Democrats do anything, the Republicans will take the opposite side. Whenever Republicans do anything, The Democrats will take the opposite side. Good cop vs. bad cop. WAKE UP PEOPLE! It's a con game! Both parties are on the same side, and it isn't the side with the United States Constitution. |
Lee Gonzales
said:
 |
another orator in another time spoke to the youth of the nation He made impassioned and fiery speeches and the film footage shows the youth of Germany smiling at their "dear leader" as he waved his arms in the air to emphasize his: "love" of "school children ... the value of education,..."  |
Bonnie
said:
|
... The Republicans cry, "This children's speech by Obama is partisan. Those speeches given by Reagan and G.H.W. were okay". The Democrats cry, "Those speeches by Reagan and Bush the Elder were partisan. This one by Obama is not and is being given with pure intentions". The true constitutional conservatives say, "Aw, cut the bull you two! You both have higher agendas, and you know it. Why not leave the encouragement and coaxing of our children to the parents and teachers, and let the president attend to matters of state?" |
Reader
said:
 |
ConfusedMOMEMENT Instead of "Teachable Momement", I think you meant a Programmable Momement. Nonetheless, I am wondering what all this has to do with Obama speaking to school children? |
Bonnie
said:
|
I can see it now... The "snitch line" of tomorrow! "Dial or test 666. It's free and your call will not be logged by the carrier. Your anonymity will be protected." |
Jim
said:
 |
... There's no constitutional authority for the federal government to be in the classroom in any capacity. Public education is clearly a power reserved to state and local authorities or to the people. The public schools are officially atheistic and learning has declined in direct proportion to the ever increasing federal involvement in them. What we need is a separation of state and school. |
Grace
said:
 |
... Obama have lost the trust of the majority of the American people (from college and newly graduate students to senior citizens). The only audience left for Obama that has not heard his speech yet, are the Children of America. He needs to be in hte spotlight all the time, that even the kids of America have to put up with it. Instead of the kids sharing to their class how they spent their summer vacation, Obama would rather have the kids think on how to help him. What a piece of %^&*&)* |
chi hair straighteners
said:
 |
chi hair straighteners Warhammer online CDkey are the codes which be used to active your chi hair tools. |
Luis Magno
said:
 |
The Great Navigator The "politically correct" treatment of the Great Navigator is the clearest and purest evidence yet of the priority which the Obama administration places on the destruction of traditional European-American history and culture. The ethnicidal dynamic evidenced by this outrageous history being taught American children very negatively impacts all ethno-racial European Americans including Anglo-Saxon Americans and indirectly negatively impacts all mixed-race Anglo-Saxon Americans as well. It also negatively impacts all Hispanic racial and mixed-racial ethnic categories. Those in control of the American educational system intend the destruction of what remains of European America's traditional languages, histories and cultures in favor of a denuded and dumbed-down multi-culturalist version of what passes today for the United States' revolutionary Anglo-Saxon core history, culture and values. European-American parents who have hitherto been oblivious to their own and their children's ethno-racial brainwashing should be up in arms over the open destruction of their European American heritage. The Genoese-born Scotsman Christopher Columbus's discovery of the American continent was a transforming event in world history. The discovery was made on October 12, 1492 and marks the birth of European America. If America's traditional European languages, histories and cultures are to be preserved and restored it is necessary on ethno-racial and sub-racial grounds that there be a renewal of the traditional American celebration and commemoration of October Twelfth. It calls for Columbus Day, America's Day of Discovery, to be resurrected and re-consecrated as a national day of fasting, meditation and prayer. Celebrate October 12th, America's Day of Discovery or Perish! |
