“Easily in fiscal year 2009 it’s not out of the realm of possibility to have a $2 trillion deficit,” Mary Ann Hurley, vice president of fixed-income trading in Seattle at D.A. Davidson & Co, told Bloomberg News on February 3. “That’s a huge number, and it has to be financed by debt issuance and the taxpayer.”
President Barack Obama blamed the current economic recession on “a binge of risk taking” by bankers in a Today Show interview that aired February 2. Specifically, here’s how Obama explained how the nation has found itself in a deepening economic crisis:
Should the stimulus bill be amended to place more emphasis on spending, or should it instead be amended to place more emphasis on tax cuts? That question defines much of the debate on the bill that passed the House without any yea votes from Republicans and is now before the Senate.
Common sense tells us that government cannot resuscitate the American economy and restore it to good health by spending more money and going further into debt. The government cannot spend money for its "bailout" and "stimulus" programs, after all, without siphoning the money out of the economy in the first place.
The House of Representatives yesterday passed the $819 billion American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, delivering President Obama his first major political victory and yet another setback to American taxpayers present and future. House Republicans, in a surprising display of partisan unity and commitment to principle, voted unanimously against the bill. Congressman John Boehner (R-Ohio) warned that such spending policies would bury the next generation under a "mountain of debt," while Congressman Dan Burton (R-Ind.) correctly pointed out that "free enterprise, less government and lower taxes is the way to solve this problem."